Photo by David Mark |
My son asked this when he was five,
with a great look of wonder and slight concern on his face. One could say the answer is “no,” because
they’re standing right-side-up relative to the earth beneath their feet, but
I’m going to go with the globe-comparison approach. My answer is: “yes,” insofar as they know
that they are upside-down as they would appear if placed on a globe, being on
the southern end of the earth, and that position being designated “down” on
standard modern maps, 3-D and otherwise.
I confidently say so because Antarctica
appears to have no indigenous people and therefore everyone there has come from
elsewhere on the globe, where I boldly presume they would have become aware
that their travels would take them south, down, to the bottom of the earth as
it appears on diagrams galore.
Even if Antarctica did have natives, chances
are they would probably have figured that Earth is round (based on the fact
that people had figured out Earth’s shape at least as early as ancient Greek civilization)
– but granted, they might not see themselves at the bottom. I have seen no evidence for any native
Antarcticans, however.
Do the people in Antarctica buy into
the idea that they’re on a globe-shaped object?
There aren’t a whole lot of statistics available detailing how many
people on earth believe it’s not spherical, but I can tell you that The Flat
Earth Society membership represents less than 1/100,000th of one percent of the
world population, so the odds are good that everyone in Antarctica
does, in fact, think they are on a round planet, the south pole of which we have
generally agreed to place at the “bottom.”
Notice that the questioning child was
not concerned with whether the folks at the bottom of it all would fall
off. He was also amenable to the idea
that while the South Pole Station crew may know that, on a globe, they’re “upside-down,”
they seem right-side-up to themselves, thanks to gravity and perspective.
Questions beget questions, and as this
one could be either succinctly or elaborately answered, it also begs a few more
items to be pondered.
Like, why is Antarctica even considered
“upside-down?” And what is actually on
the bottommost point on the globe when it’s mounted with its tilt? And have any civilizations ever thought they
were upside-down on the earth? Or about
to fall off?
Why is North “up?”
The placement of north on the topside
of a map is generally attributed to Claudius Ptolemy, a Greek scholar living
90-168 AD. Exactly why he did this is
unknown (perhaps his notes on the matter were in the Library of Alexandria before
it burned) but the practice was heartily adopted by European Renaissance
mapmakers, for whom ancient Greek pedagogy was all the rage.
It’s been theorized that the preference
was to put the better known and/or more important places at the top, and for a
Greco-European mapmaker, that would be Europe.
(So if you put the important
things at the top of the map, what would you have there? I’m thinking I might top mine off with the
local coffee shop.)
Still, maps worldwide were not
standardized to be north-up until well after that Renaissance fad. Early European maps often had east up, while
Egyptian, Arab and Chinese maps often faced south, and American maps sometimes
pointed westward. Every mapmaker had
their reasons for compass placement, but these reasons were largely lost to
time, including the original reason for north-up…but that’s the standard that
prevailed.
What’s bottom-most on a tilted globe?
Globes are usually mounted at a 23.5°
tilt in keeping with the relative position of Earth to the
Sun. When you look at the bottom of the
globe in this case, since the South Pole is tilted to the side, the actual
“bottom” of the earth falls along the Antarctic Circle, with the seas and land
masses along that line rotating their way into and out of the bottom spot. The honor of the bottommost spot goes to the
edges of Antarctica, mostly coastline and islands, including the South Shetland and South Orkney
Islands which get a close shot at being at the bottom. Those folks probably know they’re upside-down,
globe-wise, as well.
Has any human culture thought they were walking on the earth
upside-down? Or that they could fall
off?
Thus far in my travels, I have found no
hint of any culture that has thought people would drop off the earth because
they are upside-down on it.
There have been times and places when
the prevailing vision was of a flat earth.
Most ancient flat earth models I’ve encountered envisioned the world as
a disk of land floating in water, so in that case, if you fell off the end of
the earth, you would get wet. Perhaps if
you took a rowboat beyond the land’s edge, you may find the water drops off,
too, although I haven’t yet come across historical documentation of whether
these cultures envisioned an end to the water as well. Although the idea of a world-end waterfall
sure makes for a great story.
The final word
But enough of my postulating. Let’s go to the source and ask someone who has
been at South Pole Station if she knew she was upside-down at the time.
Speaking to her own perspective on
the experience, widely-traveled author Heather Shumaker says, “No, I didn't
notice being upside down, but I did notice being high up. The South Pole was on top of 2 miles of ice,
so it was like being on top of a very high mountain.”
Turns out that being at the
“bottom” of the earth can actually give one the sense of being on top of
things!
As far as the ultimate description
of placement, Shumaker sums it up perfectly: “We're all upside down to
somebody. It just depends on the way you
look at the planet.”
No comments:
Post a Comment